JOURNAL 06/18/06
Without further ado:
1) City Council
The Ol' Miner Steakhouse has had its liquor
license granted, but that
was the easy discussion. The harder part was reviewing fund
balances and
general fund revenues. This week, the council will discuss the
potential
uses of money that is beyond theoretical: a recreation tax that has
yet to
be posed to the voters.
2) City Planning Commission
A fairly full house heard the proposal for the
Van Tuyl Village by
proponent Jeff Wilkerson, which received sketch plan approval from
the
commission. The commission also recommended approval of street and
alley
vacations within the rodeo grounds.
3) County Workforce Housing Linkage
A fee attached to development based on the
number of long-term jobs that
such a project will create (for instance, caretakers or maids) went
into
effect on Wednesday, and by the Housing Authority's meeting on
Thursday,
$40,000 was already in the kitty.
4) Hard Zoning in the County
Probably isn't going to happen. What this and
other projects do dredge
up, however, is a distinct lack of respect between both the county
and the
city of Gunnison.
5) Grocery Sales Tax
Contrary to popular belief, I am not a rabid
anti-tax crusader (I'll
save that for the likes of Grover Norquist and Jon Caldera). Just
for the
record, I think the county should continue to collect a tax it's
been
collecting for nearly three decades. If no one has noticed it in
all this
time, it just can't be too onerous. So I will not be leading -- or
even in
-- the charge to stop taxing food prepared for home consumption at
the
county level. But I would like to know -- which was my only
question in the
first place -- if the farmers' market should charge this tax or not.
6) County Planning Commission
As you could see from our agenda, this is a busy
body (not a busybody).
Horse Meadows is a good example of why the city and county ought to
work
together better than they do: this one has the potential to impact
many
water users, including the City of Gunnison. And hangars at the
airport are
in the city's entrance overlay, but the city has no control over
their
appearance or the resulting noise pollution.
7) Detention Facility
Last week's meeting was changed to today.
Committee members were
supposed to have received possibilities for financing the project
prior to
the meeting, but they did not.
8) School District
An administrative resignation may lead to a
retsructuring, and the
budget should be approved as of this writing, but what people
really, really
need to realize is: This is still an extremely cash-strapped
district,
hampered by TABOR, the Gallagher Amendment, and declining
enrollment. Board
elections are this November, and there may be a plethora of seats
available.
9) Farmers' Market
The market kicks off Saturday, July 1, 9 a.m.-1
p.m. The GVCA is signing
up this week as a vendor, but we won't appear until July 8. Anyone
interested in helping out should contact Karen, and if you know of
anyone
with a large garden who might have spare produce to donate to the
causes
(the Food Pantry and the Willows will be the recipients of our cash
and
produce collection), let Karen know that too. We are also on the
lookout for
a pop-up canopy and/or table with an umbrella that we could borrow
Saturday
mornings through September. kejensenemeritus@gmail.com
10) Health Care
Without Richard on hand, we weren't sure if we
were supposed to be
coming up with names for a possible task force. The immigrant
integration
grant the county received a year ago has a component for
establishment of a
low-income health clinic, which hopefully could dovetail into this
awkward,
unwieldy and difficult process of making health care more
affordable and
accessible for everyone.
Okay, I won't get to the guts of everything this morning, so we'll
just
start at the top and go from there.
1) City Council
As always, budget is a consuming item for most
governmental boards, and
city council is no exception. last week, city manager Ken Coleman
took the
council through a review of fund balances and general fund
revenues. Several
council members were ready to include a discussion of ways of
spending a
recreation tax, but Ellen asked that it be considered separately,
since at
this point that money is entirely theoretical. So that's on the
docket for
tomorrow night.
Hockey folks and swimming pool folks, now joined by trails people,
are
interested in adding a 1-cent sales tax to purchases within the
City of
Gunnison in order to refrigerate and cover ice, build and maintain
a pool,
and presumably build and maintain trails (I haven't personally
heard that
part of the proposal).
But at a council meeting subsequent to the initial proposal, it
sounded as
if tax proponets were suggesting a sales tax for recreation in
general,
which could broaden those parameters considerably. This might
result in more
widespread support for such a proposal, but it might well thin the
funding
pools, if that's the word we want right there.
The city manager is an advocate of recreation as an economic
development
tool, and from that angle it seems a sound investment. However, the
city so
far has conducted no interest surveys or feasibility studies -- no
taking of
the taxpayer pulse, in other words. So spending thie tax money, or
even
discussing the spending of this money, seems a trifle premature and
speculative.
In addition to this tax proposal, voters should be prepared to make
a
decision on funding a jail expansion (bearing in mind that if the
feds find
our current facility inadequate, they will mandate an upgrade and
we'll have
to come up with the funding anyway), and a library expansion. Our
pot of
school money is shrinking, although there aren't many means of
taxing our
way out of the hole (as I understand it), and while affordable
housing is
being addressed at the county level, the city's looking into it as
well. And
we all should be aware that health care affordability is in a huge
crisis
nationwide. We heard a graphic presentation of how this has
impacted the San
Luis Valley (from 11 internists to 1, who used to own his own
clinic but
gave it up under the weight of $600,000 in annual bad debt). Our own
hospital has lost a substantial (25% was the last figure I heard)
amount of
income with the opening of a new orthopedic clinic.
So there are many funding issues for taxpayers to consider, and any
governmental entity ought to be very cautious about spending money
it
doesn't have in hand. Actually, that's not a darn bad rule of thumb
for
anyone.
And now my pontificating has taken me over my allowable time limit
this
morning, so that's what you get for today. More tomorrow. Maybe.
TL